H&COStart a conversation
H&CO

Exclusively jewelry & watches.
Every detail considered.

Start a conversation

Ad IntelligenceJewelry & Watches

Updated September 2026

We track one trade and nothing else. Every Google and Meta ad running for 142 jewelry and watch retailers, captured on September 20, 2026 and compared with the same panel in April 2026. Every creative was read one at a time against a fixed vocabulary. No business is named, there is no PDF to download, and there is nothing to sign up for.

Almost nobody in this data asks for the appointment.See where your own ads sit

Who’s in the research.

The category comparisons cover 136 jewelry and watch retailers. Each business is assigned one primary group in this dataset. A watch authorization does not mean it only sells watches.

Business types in the 136-retailer comparison sample
Business typeWhat it includesRetailers
Authorized retailers carrying RolexAuthorized retailers carrying Rolex, often alongside other watches and jewelry.64
Other authorized watch retailersAuthorized retailers carrying watch brands other than Rolex; they may also sell jewelry.35
Jewelry retailers without watch brandsJewelry-focused retailers with no watch brands recorded in this research.26
Pre-owned specialistsBusinesses specializing in pre-owned watches or jewelry.6
Primarily online retailersBusinesses whose primary retail model is online.5
How advertiser accounts differ from business types

Business type and advertiser account are separate classifications. The research separates each retailer’s own ads from ads attributed to other advertiser accounts. That second group is not a count of manufacturers: an advertiser can be a brand, a retailer, or another business. The public data does not break those other accounts down by business type or establish who ultimately paid for an ad.

The quarter in four figures.

8,682live ads running from the retailers’ own accounts, up 10% since April
7,591live ads attributed to other advertiser accounts, down 14%
47%of the live ads counted for the 93 businesses in both captures are attributed to other advertiser accounts
27ads a typical single store runs; the typical 10-or-more chain runs 131

Counts of live ads, not spend: neither ad library reports what anyone spent. Movement figures cover the 93 retailers present in both the April and September captures.

What each retailer did with its own advertising.

Ranked by how far a retailer’s own advertising moved relative to where it started, not by how many ads it runs, because nothing-to-a-dozen is a decision and 400-to-430 is noise.

  • Turned it on 2
  • Doubled or more 4
  • Grew 24
  • Held steady 44
  • Still dark 1
  • Cut back 8
  • Cut by half or more 9
  • Turned it off 1

Find your category.

Pick the size and the kind of business you run. Categories with fewer than 4 retailers are not published, so no business can be identified by elimination.

How many stores
What you sell

Single store

66 retailers, 50 of them advertising

Own ads, typical
27
On Google
24
On Meta
3
Other advertiser accounts
0
Running both platforms
66%
Creative that makes a claim
70%

What the ads sell

  • One product32%
  • A brand23%
  • The store itself19%
  • A category19%
  • Unreadable5%
  • An offer or event2%

The claim they lead with

  • No claim at all25%
  • Expertise, service18%
  • Selection, in stock13%
  • Heritage, long established10%
  • Authenticity, inspected10%
  • Price or value7%

Google and Meta do different jobs.

Every live creative from a retailer’s own account, read one at a time against a fixed vocabulary. Pick what you want to compare.

Google

  • A category38%
  • The store itself18%
  • Unreadable17%
  • A brand14%
  • One product9%
  • An offer or event3%

Meta

  • One product41%
  • A category32%
  • A brand15%
  • The store itself8%
  • An offer or event4%
  • Unreadable0%

What the top tenth of your class does.

Each kind of business, and the same figures for the tenth of it running the most of its own advertising. A ranking of volume, not of results: nothing in either ad library says whether an ad sold anything. No business is named, and a class too small to show a top tenth without identifying its members is left out.

  • Authorized retailers carrying Rolex

    64 on the panel · 52 advertising

    MeasureThe classTop 5
    Own ads, typical35312
    On Google27285
    On Meta1218
    Started since April22116
    Runs both platforms92%100%
    Creative that makes a claim67%75%

    Its top tenth leads with authenticity, inspected and expertise, service.

  • Other authorized watch retailers

    35 on the panel · 31 advertising

    MeasureThe classTop 4
    Own ads, typical33145
    On Google27133
    On Meta424
    Started since April755
    Runs both platforms71%75%
    Creative that makes a claim70%36%

    Its top tenth leads with heritage, long established and selection, in stock.

  • Jewelry retailers without watch brands

    26 on the panel · 18 advertising

    MeasureThe classTop 4
    Own ads, typical37139
    On Google29129
    On Meta411
    Started since April1697
    Runs both platforms72%100%
    Creative that makes a claim57%57%

    Its top tenth leads with selection, in stock and price or value.

  • Pre-owned specialists

    6 on the panel · 4 advertising

    class too small to show a top tenth without identifying its members

  • Primarily online retailers

    5 on the panel · 4 advertising

    class too small to show a top tenth without identifying its members

How to read these numbers.

  • Business type and advertiser account are separate classifications. The research separates each retailer’s own ads from ads attributed to other advertiser accounts. That second group is not a count of manufacturers: an advertiser can be a brand, a retailer, or another business. The public data does not break those other accounts down by business type or establish who ultimately paid for an ad.
  • “Live” is a recency rule, not a snapshot: an ad whose last recorded impression falls within 14 days of the day we looked at that retailer, or 40 days on Meta. At 7, 21 and 30 days the direction holds but the size moves.
  • Neither ad library reports what anyone spent. Every figure on this page is a count of live ads, so a retailer can add creative while cutting its budget and look like growth.
  • Google covers the full quarter. Meta was captured once, in September, so a campaign that ran only in July or August is invisible here.
  • The two captures are not equally fresh: April was collected over two weeks, September in a single day.
  • Google search ads carry copy but no picture, so anything about imagery covers image and video ads only.
  • Populations differ by question: 155 retailers targeted, 142 observed this quarter, 136 in the category figures, and 93 present in both captures, the only ones in any movement figure.
  • A retailer who funds an ad and is later reimbursed by a brand looks identical to one who is not. That is invisible in both libraries.
  • Five accounts hit the ad library’s per-search ceiling, so their totals are floors. The same five hit it in April, so the comparison holds.

Google captured as 2026-Q3, Meta as 2026-09, both compared with April 2026. Categories holding fewer than 4 retailers are not published.

Get told when this changes

We refresh this page when a new capture lands. Leave your email and we will tell you what moved, in a short note. No other mail, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Subscribe to the quarterly ad intelligence report

We use your details to deliver the report. Read our Privacy policy.